• Intellectual property framework


    Protection of intellectual property rights is required by the Federal Constitution and by several multilateral treaties. The main statutes in this area are federal statutes. However, in case of litigation, some matters are subject to federal jurisdiction, and others to provincial jurisdiction.

  • Commercial contract framework


    Commercial contracts are governed by the Civil and Commercial Code. This code came into effect in 2015 and it replaces the previous separate Civil Code and Commercial Code. It is part of the federal legislation, but jurisdiction regarding its implementation and litigation resulting thereunder corresponds primarily to the provincial courts.

    The Civil and Commercial Code includes general provisions on contracts, which are applicable to all contractual transactions. These provisions govern matters such as the formation of contracts, offer and acceptance, possible subject matter of contracts, legal formalities, the legal effects of contracts, contract termination and others.

    In addition, the Civil and Commercial Code includes provisions applicable to specific types of contracts, such as sale agreements, leases, franchise agreements and agency agreements. More than 30 types of agreements are subject to specific provisions of this kind. These specially regulated agreements are thus subject to the general rules applicable to contracts –described above – and to the special rules applicable to the relevant type of agreement. Agreements that are not subject to special rules are nevertheless valid, and they are governed primarily by the general contract rules and – to the degree possible – by the rules applicable to analogous specially regulated contracts.

    Other laws include provisions on specific types of commercial contracts. For instance, the Copyright Law includes certain provisions of contracts related to software and to publishing; the Patent Law includes rules on license agreements; and the Insurance Law includes rules on insurance contracts. However, in all these specially regulated contracts, the general contract law rules included in the Civil and Commercial Code are also applicable.

    Commercial contracts with the federal or provincial governments or with other governmental entities are also governed by administrative law. Special rules on contracts with state entities have been included in federal or provincial laws, or have been developed by case law.

  • Copyrights

    Nature of right

    Copyright protects intellectual creations in all fields of science, art and literature. Article 1 of the Copyright Law includes a non-exhaustive list of possible intellectual works protected by copyright. These include, among others, literary and artistic works, music, architectural works and software.

    Copyright protects intellectual expressions, but not ideas. For example, the contents of a book in terms of sentences and other literary expressions are protected by copyright, but the creative idea underlying the book as a whole is not.

    Copyright results from the creation of an intellectual work. Registration is not necessary for copyright to exist, although it is necessary for the exercise of some rights by local authors. Upon creation of a protected work, copyright belongs to the original author or authors, who then may transfer their right, by contract or by the operation of certain legal rules.

    Copyright includes economic and moral rights. Economic rights consist, basically, in the exclusive right to use and exploit the protected work. The Copyright Law lists some of the elements of this exclusive right, such as the right to reproduce the relevant work, to market copies, to prepare derivative works or to have the work performed publicly.

    Moral rights include the so call "integrity right" – that is, the right to preserve the text, title and other contents of the work, even if property rights on such work have been assigned; the "paternity right," the author’s right to be named and identified as such together with the work; the "publication right," the right to decide whether the right will be published; and the "alteration right," the right to modify the work, even after it has been published. Moral rights belong to the author and they are generally non-assignable.

    Legal framework

    Copyright law is included in Law 11, 723, as amended. In addition, multiple laws and regulations govern matters such as related rights, publishers' rights and collective management societies.

    Argentina is part of the main multilateral international copyright agreements, such as the Trips Agreement, the Berne Convention and the Rome Convention. The provisions of these agreements are actively enforced by the courts.

    Duration of right

    The general rule is that copyright protection lasts for a term of seventy years, counted as of January 1 of the first year after the death of the author, as well as through the life of the author.

    In the case of work done through cooperation, the 70-year term is computed from the death of the last person who participated in the joint authorship of the work involved.

    In the case of posthumous works, the 70-year term is computed from the death of the author.

    The duration of protection of anonymous works whose copyright belongs to institutions, corporations or legal entities is 50 years from the date of publication of the work.

    Special rules on copyright duration apply to specific types of copyrightable works, such as photographs and cinematographic works.

    Ownership / licenses

    The basic rule is that ownership belongs to the author. Special rules have been developed in connection with special types of works, such as cinematographic works, derivative works and software.

    There are several types of joint ownership. It may apply to works done through cooperation, which imply a creative collaboration between different authors; to collective works, which are those created through the initiative or direction of one or more individuals, who coordinate or direct the efforts of several other individuals to achieve a joint result; and to composite works, which are the result of adding different separate works, each with a possible separate author and owner, into one final result.

    Works created by employees who have been hired for that purpose belong to the employer.

    Copyright may be subject to licenses, generally as part of broader contractual arrangements such as publishing agreements.

    Remedies for infringement

    Damages may be claimed before civil courts for all types of copyright violation. Registration of works is not necessary, except for local authors, whose rights may be suspended until registration takes place.

    It is also possible to file civil action to prevent further copyright violation, and to obtain preliminary remedies, such as injunction, in the course of civil procedures.

    Criminal remedies, particularly fines, are possible, but are not frequently applied.

  • Mask works / topographies

    Nature of right

    Mask works and topographies are not separately protected under Argentine law. They may be protected under patent law or by way of confidentiality.

    Legal framework

    Argentina has enacted no specific rules on chip protection. Although Argentina is part of the WTO and has approved the Trips Agreement, it has not yet implemented any rules on chip protection.

    The provisions on chip protection included in the Trips Agreement have not been deemed immediately applicable under Argentine law. In addition, Argentina has not ratified or implemented other multilateral treaties on chip protection, in particular the Treaty of Washington of 1989.

    Semiconductor technology, generally, and topographies, in particular, may be protected under the traditional intellectual property rules applicable to all types of technology, specially patent law and the rules on confidential information. Therefore, matters such as the duration of the relevant rights, ownership and remedies depend on the type of protection used in connection with each specific mask work or topography.

    Duration of right

    Not applicable for this jurisdiction.

    Ownership / licenses

     Not applicable for this jurisdiction.

    Remedies for infringement

    Not applicable for this jurisdiction.

  • Patents

    Nature of right

    Patents are a statutory right. The granting of patents is required by the Argentine Constitution and by different international documents, particularly the Trips Agreement. Patent rights imply an exclusive right to exploit a process or a product. The Argentine Patent Law defines the limits of these exclusive rights, on the basis of the provisions of the Trips Agreement.

    Legal framework

    Patents are governed by the Patent Law – Law 24,481, as amended. In addition, they are governed by the Trips Agreement and by the Paris Convention. Argentina is not a party to the Patent Cooperation Treaty.

    Duration of right

    The basic rule is that patents expire 20 years after the date in which the relevant patent application was filed. Argentina uses a "first to file" system, but it also applies the priority rules derived from the Paris Convention.

    Argentine law provides special rules on compulsory licenses and on patent termination due to lack of exploitation of the patented invention. Compulsory licenses may be granted in case of non-exploitation, competition law violations or sanitary emergencies, among other cases. Patent termination may result when, after a compulsory license was granted for lack of exploitation, no exploitation of the invention takes place for two years after the license was granted.

    Ownership / licenses

    Joint ownership is permissible. The Patent Law includes provisions on the exercise of patent rights by the joint owners. In addition the Civil and Commercial Code rules on joint property apply to patents.

    The Patent law includes rules on licenses. Licenses are not exclusive, unless the parties provide otherwise. Competition law rules are applicable to restrictive clauses included in license agreements.

    Remedies for infringement

    The Patent law provides both civil and criminal law remedies for cases of infringement.

    Civil remedies include the compensation of damages and termination of the infringing activities.

    A complex system of rules for preliminary remedies in patent cases is included in the Patent law. Generally, suspension of an alleged infringer's exploitation requires a preliminary procedure, with the participation of expert witnesses.

    Criminal procedures and sanctions are rare.

  • Trademarks

    Nature of right

    A trademark may consist of one or more words, with or without conceptual content, drawings, commercial symbols, monograms, engravings, prints, seals, images, stripes, color combinations, letter and number combinations, the special graphics of letters and numbers, advertisement phrases, reliefs, and any other sign with distinctive capacity.

    A trademark is normally protected by means of its registration. However, de facto trademarks, that is those that are used but not registered, are also protected in a more limited way.

    Legal framework

    Trademarks are governed by the Trademark Law – Law 22,362, as amended.

    In addition, trademarks are protected by the rules included in Trips Agreement and in the Paris Convention.

    Duration of right

    Registered trademarks are protected for a period of ten years, from the moment of registration. Trademark registration may be renewed indefinitely.

    Registration may be cancelled for lack of use during a period of five years. In addition, renewal of registration requires proof of the trademark's prior use.

    Ownership / licenses

    Ownership is acquired by means of registration. However, use of unregistered trademarks may result in certain rights for the user.

    Trademarks may be subject to joint ownership. The Trademark Law and the Civil and Commercial Code provide the rules applicable to these joint ownership relationships.

    Trademark licenses are possible. They are valid even if they are not registered with the trademark office.

    Remedies for infringement

    The Trademark Law provides both civil and criminal law remedies for cases of infringement.

    Civil remedies include the compensation of damages and the termination of the infringing activities.

    Special preliminary remedies are applicable in cases of trademark infringement. The trademark owner may obtain an injunction against the infringer, when the trademark is registered and its violation is immediately evident.

    Criminal law remedies are rarely used in practice.

  • Trade secrets

    Nature of right

    Argentine law provides protection for trade secrets and confidential information. A complex set of rules creates rights against conduct whereby access is gained illegally to confidential information, or which implies illegal use of trade secrets or confidential information or which results in the unauthorized and harmful disclosure of confidential or secret information.

    Confidential information is characterized by the fact that it is kept in a reserved manner and that it is not generally available for technicians working in the relevant technical field. Trade secrets receive a special degree of protection, particularly under criminal law.

    Legal framework

    Confidential information is governed and protected by Law 24,766. It is also protected by the Trips Agreement and by the Paris Convention.

    In addition, multiple rules and statutes protect confidential information and trade secrets. Labor law protects the confidentiality and ownership of information used in employment relationships.

    Several criminal law rules apply to special types of violations of confidentiality. In particular, disclosure of trade secrets and unfair competition by means of the illegal use or appropriation of trade secrets are subject to criminal law penalties.

    Duration of right

    Confidential information and trade secrets is protected for as long as the relevant information is kept confidential. The degree of protection diminishes if the information ceases to be objectively a secret, due to its previous disclosure or because it has been obtained independently by other parties.

    Ownership / licenses

    Ownership results from the obtention of the information, accompanied by legal or practical measures aimed at restricting access to that information by third parties. No registration requirement is applicable.

    Joint ownership is possible.

    Trade secret or know-how licenses are common and enforceable.

    Remedies for infringement

    Argentine law provides civil and criminal law remedies for cases of trade secret infringement.

    Damages caused by these violations must be compensated. It is also possible to obtain court orders requiring termination of the violation.

    Preliminary remedies include injunctions against further exploitation or disclosure of trade secrets.

    Criminal remedies are applicable in cases of disclosure of trade secrets acquired in the course of employment and other professional relationship, as well as in cases in which the violation of the rights to confidential information or trade secrets results in unfair competition.

  • Other key IP rights

    Nature of right

    Industrial designs

    Industrial models and designs are protected by special industrial property rights. An industrial model or design consists in the forms embodied in or the aspect applied to an industrial or artisan product, which confer an ornamental character to such product.

    Exclusive rights on industrial models and designs result from registration of the relevant model or design.

    Industrial designs

    Industrial designs

    Legal framework

    Industrial designs

    Industrial models and designs are protected by Decree 6673/1963, as amended. They are also protected in accordance with the Trips Agreement and the Paris Convention.

    Duration of right

    Industrial designs

    The rights derived from the registration of an industrial model or design last for a five-year period, counted from the date of filing of the relevant application. The registration may be renewed for two successive five-year period, if the owner requests such renewal.

    Ownership / licenses

    Industrial designs

    Ownership belongs to the author. There is a rebuttable presumption to the effect that the first applicant of an industrial model or design registration is the author of such industrial model or design. Joint ownership is possible, and is governed by the Civil and Commercial Code and by Decree 6673/1963 as amended.

    Industrial models or designs may be the subject matter of license agreements. No registration is necessary for the validity of these agreements.

    Remedies for infringement

    Industrial designs

    Civil and criminal law remedies are applicable in case of infringement. Civil remedies include the compensation of damages and termination of the violation.

    Preliminary injunctions and remedies are possible in accordance with general procedural rules.

    Criminal sanctions have been recently reinforced, but they are rarely applied.

  • Intellectual property in employment context


    Special rules on employee inventions are included in the Patent Law and in the Labor Contract Law.

    There are basically three types of invention, from the perspective of employer-employee relationships. First, inventions made in technological areas for which the employee was hired as a researcher or developer belong to the employer. The employee may be entitled to a special compensation if he or she develops a patented invention which exceeds the normal scope of the employee's work. Second, inventions related to the employee's work or related to the employer's know-how or activities belong to the employee, but allow the employer to exercise an option to acquire rights over the invention. If the option is exercised, the employee is entitled to a payment reflecting the value of the invention. Third, inventions that do not fall into the two previous categories belong to the employee.

    Similar rules are applicable in the case of other types of technology or intellectual property rights. In the case of software, the law applies the “work for hire” doctrine, but allows the parties to agree to different contractual rules.

    Consultants / contractors

    The law is not explicit about the rights of consultants and contractors, who do not qualify as employees, with regard to technology and other intellectual property they develop. Generally, the parties may agree as to the rules which will apply to such rights. In the absence of a contractual framework, the technology or intellectual property generated by a consultant or contractor who was hired with the purpose of developing such items that will belong to the person paying for such work.

  • Key commercial contract considerations

    Registration of commercial agreements

    The general rule is that commercial agreements are not registered, and that their validity and effect is not subject to registration requirements. However, certain types of agreement must be registered to be effective or to have full effects against third parties. Agreements subject to registration include business association agreements, certain publishing agreements, certain chattel mortgages and certain agreements related to real estate. International transfer of technology agreements are subject to registration for tax purposes.

    Recognized language of commercial agreements

    Agreements are generally entered in Spanish. However, it is legally possible to enter agreements written in other languages. These agreements must be translated when presented in court. Spanish language may be necessary in consumer transactions.

    Country-specific issues for online content

    Argentina has ratified the WIPO conventions applicable online content and practices. However, enforcement of these conventions is weak.

    Enforceability of online/clickwrap/shrinkwrap terms

    The general rule is that acceptance of terms included in online, click wrap or shrink wrap elements is valid and effective, provided such acceptance is clearly stated and applies to terms that were known to the person giving the acceptance. However, several rules may limit the effects of agreements entered by these mechanisms, particularly consumer protection rules and rules on adhesion contracts.

    Governing law

    The basic rule is that the parties may agree as to the law that will govern their contractual rights and as to the applicable jurisdiction in case of dispute. This freedom of election is subject to several limitations. Non-Argentine law will not be enforced in Argentine courts if it  is contrary to Argentine public policy. Also, certain matters are necessarily governed by Argentine law. For example, if a business association is created in Argentina, its organization and other corporate aspects will be governed by Argentine law. Decisions made by non-Argentine courts or arbitration tribunals are enforceable in Argentina only after going through a special procedure before the Argentine courts, in the context of which the decision will only be enforced if it complies with certain rules, particularly not violating Argentine public policy. In addition, certain matters – ie, deciding the validity of a patent issued in Argentina – are necessarily subject to Argentine jurisdiction.

  • Key commercial contract terms

    Enforceability of warranty disclaimers

    Argentine law provides certain warranties, generally applicable to all types of contracts implying the transfer of rights. These warranties apply, in particular, to the validity of the rights being transferred and to the fitness of the goods regarding which rights are transferred.

    The general rule is that these warranties may be limited or eliminated by agreement between the parties. However, these disclaimers are totally or partially invalid in several types of cases: if the transferor had prior knowledge of the invalidity of the transferred rights or of the deficiency of the goods involved; if the transferor is a merchant and the parties waiving his or her rights are not; and if the warranty disclaimer is included in a consumer or adhesion contract.

    Enforceability of exclusions/limitations of liability indemnification

    Exclusions or limitations of liability indemnification are valid if they meet the general conditions applicable to contractual. However, they may be unenforceable in the following cases: when they extend to willful violations or defaults, or to violations or defaults resulting from gross negligence; when they are imposed in adhesion or consumer contracts; or when they result in the violation or annulment of rights that may not be removed or limited contractually.


    The basic rule under Argentine law if full indemnification of economic or moral damages caused by illegal conduct, whether that conduct constitutes a contractual or a tort violation.

    The parties are free to include contractual rules as to the extent of their indemnification obligations.

    Penalty clauses and liquidated damages clauses are acceptable, but they may be limited or amended by the courts if their terms are deemed abusive.

    In the absence of contractual provisions, the indemnification's extent will depend on circumstances such as the willful or negligent nature of the violation, foreseeability of the damages caused and the comparative fault of the parties.

    Electronic signatures

    Electronic signatures are valid and effective under Argentine law. However, certain legal effects require that the signature comply with a special certification regime.

  • Key contacts
    Guillermo Cabanellas
    Guillermo Cabanellas
    Senior Partner DLA Piper (Argentina) [email protected] T +5411 41145500 View bio


Remedies for infringement


The Patent law provides both civil and criminal law remedies for cases of infringement.

Civil remedies include the compensation of damages and termination of the infringing activities.

A complex system of rules for preliminary remedies in patent cases is included in the Patent law. Generally, suspension of an alleged infringer's exploitation requires a preliminary procedure, with the participation of expert witnesses.

Criminal procedures and sanctions are rare.


The available remedies for infringement include injunction and damages or an account of profits. The damages may be calculated with reference to the value of the diverted sales or the going royalty rate that the infringer would have had to pay had a license been granted.

A court can refuse to award damages or make an order for an account of profits if it determines that the infringement was innocent. An innocent infringement occurs when the defendant was not aware, and had no reasonable grounds for suspecting, that their act constituted an infringement.


Civil remedies for infringement include:

  • Cessation of infringement (preliminary or permanent injunction)
  • Claim for elimination of the circumstances constituting the infringement
  • Rendering of account
  • Publication of judgment
  • Monetary relief

Criminal remedies may include:

  • Monetary fine
  • Imprisonment

Based on a regulation of the European Council (EC No. 608/2013) in combination with the Austrian Product Piracy Act (PPG 2004), an application for action may be filed with the Customs Authorities in order to prevent the import of infringing goods.


The remedies for patent infringement and the principle of exhaustion are similar to those applicable to copyright infringement.


Criminal remedies for patent infringement include: imprisonment, monetary fine and seizure of infringing products.

Civil remedies for patent infringement include: injunction to prevent the continuation of infringements and damages. Furthermore, interested parties may file a court action requesting a cancelation of the patent before the Federal Court.


The Patent Act permits awards for damages following the grant of a patent and reasonable compensation for infringing acts before grant, together with interest.

Equitable remedies include an accounting of profits (as an alternative to damages) and interlocutory or permanent injunctions. Punitive damages awards are rare and require high-handed, egregious and oppressive conduct in carrying out the infringing acts.


The owner of the invention can generally require to stop the acts that violate the invention, the indemnification of damages, the implementation of necessary measures to prevent the infringement from continuing, and the publication of the judgment at the expense of the convicted person, through advertisements in a newspaper of the holder's choice.

The law provides for criminal penalties that range from 25 to 1,000 UTM (approx. 1,600 to 65,000 USD).


Damages can be calculated based on:

  • Lost profits
  • Illegal gains by the infringer
  • Up to three times the reasonable royalty

Should it be difficult to determine the damages based on any of these mechanisms, the court has the discretion to grant statutory damages the maximum of which is ¥1 million under the current Patent Law.

Injunctive relief is also a possible remedy.


Resolution 486 establishes different mechanisms to protect the patent or its validity. Firstly, any interested third party or the SIC ex officio may decree the absolute invalidity of the patent in compliance with the causes defined by law. Moreover, the SIC may cancel a patent when it has been granted to a person not entitled to such grant. The action for cancellation may only be brought by the person to whom the right to the patent belongs.

The owner of the patent may claim its right before the ordinary jurisdiction of its country. Nevertheless, the judge must request that the Andean Court of Jurisdiction of the CAN provide its opinion on the case prior to the taking of the decision, which shall apply and consider the opinion of the Andean judge.


Furthermore, patents are protected by criminal law. For this reason, infringements may be investigated by the general prosecutor and penalized by the criminal courts with fines and prison sentences between 4 and 8 years.

Czech Republic

Possibility to claim actual damages for infringement.

Possible to seek preventing importation of goods that are infringing.

Injunctive relief is also a possible remedy.

Criminal penalties are possible.


Remedies for negligent or willful patent infringement include equitable and reasonable compensation for the use and compensation for losses and further injuries caused by the infringement. Costs and reasonable attorneys' fees can also be recoverable.

It is possible to obtain a court order for destruction of infringing products. An initial step can be to obtain a preliminary court order for the confiscation of infringing products and equipment used in the manufacture thereof.

Criminal penalties are possible.


Remedies for patent infringement include a reasonable, non-punitive compensation for the use of the patent, typically calculated on the basis of what an applicable license would have cost. In case of negligence, compensation for other damages may also be awarded. Reasonable legal costs can also be demanded from the infringing party. Injunction can be granted by a court in patent infringement cases, as well as the destruction of infringing goods. Criminal penalties such as fines and even imprisonment are possible.


French law prohibits both direct infringement and contributory infringement.

Patent infringement actions may be brought before Paris courts (which have exclusive jurisdiction), usually after having gathered evidence via an infringement seizure (saisie-contrefaçon), by way of an action on the merits and a summary action in order to obtain an interlocutory injunction.

Manufacturers and importers are regarded as automatic infringers (ie, need not be aware of the patent at stake to qualify as infringers).

An injunction against the further manufacture, import, offer, sale, use or storage of the work can be ordered with immediate enforceability and subject to penalties.

In determining the amount of damages to be awarded (compensatory – not punitive), French courts take into account distinctively:

  • The negative or detrimental economic consequences of infringement, including lost gains and losses suffered by the rights holder
  • The moral harm suffered by the rights holder
  • The profits earned by the infringer, including intellectual, tangible and promotional investments saved or not incurred by the infringer.

As an alternative and upon request of the rights holder, French courts may set the damages as a lump sum. This sum must be greater than the royalties that would have been owed if the infringer had sought a license. This amount is not exclusive of compensation for moral harm caused to the rights holder.

Remedies also include, notably, the recall, destruction or confiscation of the infringing products and the publication of the judgment.

Before the criminal courts, an infringer faces a fine of up to €300,000 (or €750,000 in certain circumstances) and imprisonment for up to 3 years (7 years in certain circumstances).


Different remedies are possible, with the most commonly sought remedies being injunction and damages. Also, an exclusive licensee may enforce patent or utility models against infringers. Damages may be calculated as adequate license fees, infringer's profits or lost profits of the rights holder. In order to calculate damages, the rights holder can ask for a rendering of accounts.

Rights holders or exclusive licensees may make a claim for recall and destruction of infringing products. Customs seizure to stop the import of infringing products is also available.

Statutory costs for legal prosecution (court costs and attorney fees) are recoverable up to a cap established by German law.

Hong Kong, SAR

The remedies for infringement include order for delivery up or destruction of the infringed article, damages, an account of profits, declaration of infringement and injunctive relief.

Relief for groundless threats of infringement is available. Relief may be in the form of a declaration that the threats are unjustifiable, an injunction against the continuance of the threats or damages for any loss that has been sustained by the threats.


Article 35 of the Patent Act contains special remedies, eg, the following can be requested from the court: establishing the infringement, claim for cease and desist, amendment declaration by the infringer, providing information on the infringement, among others confiscating or destroying the products affected by the infringement and also the tools and materials used for the infringement.

In regards to financial remedies, compensation for damages according to the civil law and restitution of the economic gains achieved through the infringement can be requested. According to the court practice the amount of such economic gain can be equal to the unpaid license fee, or with the net income (after the deduction of the costs) achieved through the infringement. In each case, the proportion of the patented part within the infringing product shall be taken into account.

Attorneys' fees can be recovered, although the court has the power to reduce such fees, should they be excessive.

Injunctive relief is also a possible remedy even before initiating a lawsuit. Ex parte injunctive relief can be requested as well.


The relief, which a court may grant in any suit for infringement includes an injunction and at the option of the plaintiff, either damages or an account of profits. The court may also order goods which are found to be infringing and materials and implements, the predominant use of which is the creation of infringing goods, to be seized, forfeited or destroyed.

If the person committing an offense is a company, then the company, as well as every person in charge of and responsible to the company for the conduct of its business at the time of the commission of the offense would be deemed to be guilty of the offense and be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.

No criminal penalties are awarded under the Patents Act in respect of patent infringement claims.


Compensation, injunction or a combination of the two may be ordered by the Commercial Court as remedies for infringement. Criminal sanctions are in the form of imprisonment and/or fine.


The primary remedies available to a patent holder in relation to infringement are:

  • Injunctive relief
  • Damages
  • An account of profits
  • Delivery up of the infringing product and/or
  • A declaration that the patent is valid and has been infringed


As with copyrights, injunctive and monetary relief are available, although the likelihood of possible double recovery is low. It should be noted that no statutory damages are available for patent infringement.


Any person having reason to fear for the infringement of rights belonging to him under the Italian Intellectual Property Code, or who seeks to prevent the continuation or repetition of an infringement which has already occurred, may commence legal proceedings to ensure that his right is recognized and the infringement is put to an end. In such circumstances, the right holder will be entitled to remedies, including injunction and damages.

Injunctions can be granted also as preliminary measures, by way of a summary proceedings, which could stop the infringement within 3-9 months from the petition date. The court may also order the seizure of the products and of all matters constituting an infringement of the patent

Another relevant remedy is the so-called "search order," which allows patent owner to collect evidence of the infringement through a raid in the presence of a bailiff and, where necessary, of an expert appointed by the court.

Criminal penalties may also apply under certain circumstances.


Monetary damages can be levied. There are certain statutory presumptions to calculate damages but punitive damages are not available under Japanese law.

Injunctive relief, including seeking/preventing importation of infringing goods, is available as a remedy.

Measures are available to restore the business reputation of the patent holder and exclusive licensee (eg, publishing an apology in a newspaper).

Each joint owner can seek a remedy for infringement without the other owner's consent.

Criminal penalties are possible for patent infringement.


The possible remedies for infringement are set out under title IX "Trademark counterfeiting" of the Patent Act:

  • Cessation of infringement (provisional or permanent), possibly accompanied by the penalty of a daily fine
  • Publication of the judgment
  • Damages to make good the harm caused
  • Confiscation or destruction of infringing goods and of the instruments, devices or means specifically intended for committing the infringement

Reference should also be made to the description and saisie-contrefaçon procedures (Article 79 of the Patent Act), which respectively allow for:

  • The drawing up of a detailed description of the allegedly infringing articles and the instruments that have served to commit the alleged infringement by a sworn expert
  • And the unexpected seizure of allegedly infringing articles and the instruments that have served to commit the alleged infringement

Both procedures serve the purpose of gathering evidence of and more information regarding infringements and may not exceed a period of three months from notification of the order to the person or to his domicile.


Violation may lead to the payment of damages and losses, which shall be determined by a court of law based on actual damage and loss.

Criminal penalties may be imposed.


A patent holder is entitled to remedies for infringement similar to those available for infringement of other intellectual property rights, which warrant both (interim and final) injunctive and monetary relief (see Article 70 et seq of the Dutch Patent Act).

Damages as well as surrender of profits made can only be awarded if the infringer knew or should reasonably have known his or her actions entailed a patent infringement. A number of supplementary, injunctive sanctions may be applied for, such as:

  • A recall or definitive removal from the channels of commerce, surrender to the patent holder or destruction, of the infringing goods and in appropriate cases, of the materials and implements principally used in the creation or manufacture of these goods
  • The right of information, ordering the infringer to share precise information on the origin of the infringing goods or services, the distribution channels and the identity of any third parties involved in the infringement
  • The dissemination of the decision in full or in part

A European rule of exhaustion applies, which means that if a particular patented product, or product that has been directly obtained through the patented process, has been brought into circulation for the first time with the consent of the patent holder within the Community, and/or Curacao or St. Martin, then the bringing of that particular product into circulation in any other way shall not be considered patent infringement.

According to Article 1019h of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure, generally the losing party is obliged to pay the legal costs of the winning party. However, the judge has the authority to decide that these costs will be partly compensated by the winning party.

New Zealand

Infringement proceedings may be brought in court by the patentee or, in some cases, the licensee. The relief available includes injunctive relief and, at the option of the plaintiff, damages or an account of profits.

However, the court may not award damages or an account of profits for infringement if the defendant proves that, at the date of infringement, the defendant did not know and ought not reasonably to have known that the patent existed or that the complete specification had become open to public inspection. If a product is marked merely to indicate that it is patented, this will not be sufficient to presume the defendant ought to have known the product was patented.


Remedies for patent infringement include equitable and reasonable compensation for the use and compensation for losses and further injuries caused by negligent or willful infringement. Criminal penalties and injunctions against continuous infringements can also be granted.


Polish law provides remedies for patent holders to combat patent infringement, such as demands to cease infringement, to compensate for damage incurred (also by paying a license fee), and the return of unfairly gained profits. Furthermore, under Polish law it is possible to pursue claims to prohibit actions constituting a threat of patent infringement. The patent holder may also seek a preliminary injunction before initiating the main proceedings, under which, for example, the infringing actions must be ceased and the infringing goods seized and held for the duration of the main infringement proceedings before the court.

In some instances, patent infringement may be regarded as the misappropriation of third party economic right.

Patent infringement claims may be pursued once the patent is granted. However, the patent holder may pursue claims against an infringer for infringements that occurred from the moment the patent application was published by the Patent Office (under some circumstances, also for an earlier period) or, in the case of a European patent validated in Poland, from the moment the information on the submission (to the Polish Patent Office) of a translation of the patent claim is published by the Polish Patent Office.

Contributory or indirect infringement and inducement is not regulated in the Industrial Property Law Act. However, based on general civil law rules, any person that induces another person to inflict damage, or that assists this person, as well as any person that consciously benefits from the damage inflicted on a patent holder, may be held liable for these acts.

In patent infringement litigation, the losing party must, upon the request of the adverse party, reimburse the court costs and attorneys' fees (capped fees). When only a part of the claims is awarded, the costs may either be waived or proportionally shared between the parties. In specially justified cases, the court may also charge the losing party with only a part of the costs or no costs at all. In the case of a settlement, the costs are waived, unless the parties agree otherwise.


Whenever there is violation of or justified fear that another party may cause serious and difficult-to-repair harm to an industrial property right, including patent rights, the court may, at request of the interested party, order the appropriate measures to prevent any imminent violation or to prohibit continuation of the violation.

Whoever illegally violates the industrial property rights of another person with intent or by negligence shall be obliged to pay a compensation to the injured party for damages resulting from the violation.

In determining the amount of compensation for losses and damages, the court shall take into account the profit obtained by the infringer and the resulting damages and lost profits suffered by the injured party. The costs borne with the protection of the right in question and the investigation and termination of the harmful conduct shall also be taken in consideration, as well as personal injury.

If it is impossible to quantify the losses effectively suffered by the injured party, the court may, provided this is not opposed by the injured party, alternatively define a fixed amount with recourse to equity, that is based, as a minimum value, on the remuneration that the injured party would have received if the infringer had requested authorization to use the industrial property rights in question and the costs borne with the protection of the industrial property right and the investigation and termination of the harmful conduct.

Infringement of the exclusive right granted by a patent may be also punishable as crime with imprisonment up to 3 years or a fine.


Patent law permits an award of damages in an amount adequate to compensate for the infringement which includes the actual loss and loss of profit.

Injunctive relief is also a possible remedy.

Infringement of patent rights is a criminal offense in the form of counterfeit punishable by imprisonment in certain conditions.


The owner of the patent or an exclusive licensee is entitled to the following primary remedies:

  • Demand to stop infringement
  • Demand to redress damages in full
  • Demand seizure of media bearing infringing objects; criminal penalties may also apply under certain circumstances

Saudi Arabia

A wronged party can seek damages/compensation for infringement of its rights and harm suffered. In addition, the Patents Law stipulates certain penalties for infringement (without prejudice to further liability which may arise from other laws), including:

  • An injunction
  • A fine of up to SAR 100,000 (which may be doubled for a repeat offender)
  • A possible jail term (including referral to the Board of Grievances)
  • Naming and shaming in two daily newspapers and the Official Gazette (the cost of which is borne by the party in breach)
  • Any other prompt measures considered necessary to prevent damages resulting from the infringement


The patent owner and his exclusive licensee are entitled to take legal action against an infringing party. Remedies available to the patent owner and his exclusive licensee include applying for an injunction to stop the infringing action, demanding for the profits gained by the infringing party or seeking damages for the loss suffered.

Slovak Republic

In the case of an unauthorized interference with the rights, the owner of a patent is entitled mainly to seek prohibition of unlawful interferences of the rights or threats to the rights and removal of the consequences of such interferences. If due to such interference with the owner's rights any damage has been caused, the owner shall have the right to damages including loss of profits. If non-pecuniary damage has occurred, the owner has the right to reasonable compensation, including financial compensation. Right to unjust enrichment is not affected.

The right to remuneration of damages as well as loss of profits shall become statute-barred three years after the date on which the owner of the patent becomes aware of the caused damage or non-pecuniary damage and who is responsible for it. Pursuant to the Civil Code, in the case of a breach or a threat of an intellectual property right which may be the object of a license agreement (such as patent), the amount of damages shall be at least equal to the remuneration for a license granted at the time of unauthorized interference with the right.

In addition, criminal sanctions pursuant to the Criminal Code shall apply.

South Korea

The remedies available for infringement are:

  • Criminal sanction (quite rare)
  • Preliminary injunction
  • Permanent injunction
  • Damages

Under the amended PA which became effective on July 9, 2019, courts are authorized to award damages as a punitive measure of up to three times the amount of actual damages for intentional or willful acts of patent infringement. 


According to the Spanish Law 24/2015 on Patents, the owner of a patent may bring appropriate action of any type or nature before the ordinary courts against any person who infringes his rights and he may demand the necessary measures to safeguard those rights.

The owner whose patent rights have been infringed may, in particular, seek:

  • Cessation of the acts that infringe his rights
  • Compensation for the damages suffered
  • Seizure of the objects produced or imported in infringement of his rights, as well as the means used for such production or for carrying out the patented process
  • Whenever possible, attribution of the ownership of the objects and means seized. In such cases, the value of the goods concerned shall be deducted from the compensation for damages. Where that value exceeds that of the compensation granted, the owner of the patent shall pay the excess to the other party
  • The adoption of the necessary measures to prevent continued infringement of the patent, in particular, the transformation of the objects or means seized, or their destruction when such is indispensable in order to prevent infringement of the patent
  • Publication of the judgment against the person infringing the patent, at his cost, by means of announcements and notification to the persons concerned

Any person who, without the consent of the owner of the patent, manufactures or imports items protected by the patent or uses the patented process, shall be liable for the damages.

Compensation for damages due to the owner of the patent shall not only include the amount of the loss that he has suffered, but also the profits lost through infringement of his rights.

The owner of the patent may also require compensation for the damage suffered as a result of the loss of reputation of the patented invention caused by the person infringing his rights through defective manufacture or unsatisfactory presentation of the invention on the market.


Remedies for patent infringement include equitable and reasonable compensation for the use and compensation for losses and further injuries caused by negligent or willful infringement. Costs and reasonable attorneys' fees can also be recoverable.

It is possible to file customs actions applications to prevent importation of infringing goods, as well as to obtain a court order for destruction of infringing products and equipment used in the manufacture thereof.

Injunctive relief is also a possible remedy.

Criminal penalties are possible.


Available remedies for infringement include declaratory actions, actions for performance, damages, confiscation and destruction.

Actual damages can be monetary loss suffered by the patent owner, or profits gained by the infringer. Injunctive relief and publication of judgments are also possible remedies.

It is possible to seek the prevention of importation of infringing goods.

Criminal penalties are also possible.

Taiwan, China

  • Claim for damages and, in the case of willful infringement, damages up to three times proven damages
  • Request to stop or prevent infringement
  • Request for destruction of the infringing articles, materials and implements used in the infringing act
  • Apply to the Customs authorities for tentatively seizing the imported or exported articles that are suspected of infringing the patent right(s)

  • Request for restoration of the impaired reputation


The patent owner or an authorized person (eg, licensee) may seek the following remedies under Ukrainian law:

  • Termination of the infringement
  • Cancellation of the infringing patent
  • Reimbursement of damages (including loss of profit)
  • Recognition of a right
  • Seizure of infringing goods
  • Prohibition of import
  • Publication of the court decision on the case concerning IP rights infringement

Further, the Criminal Code of Ukraine dated April 5, 2001 provides for criminal liability for infringements of intellectual property right with regard to inventions and utility models.

United Arab Emirates

The Patent Law sets out four criminal acts relating to infringement:

  • Producing false documents to obtain a patent, utility certificate, know how or an industrial design or drawing registration
  • Declaring false information to obtain a patent, utility certificate or know how or an industrial design or drawing registration
  • Copying an invention, a process, an element of know how or an industrial design or drawing
  • Intentionally infringing any right protected by the Patent Law

A right holder or a licensee may apply for a precautionary attachment order ex parte to the urgent matters judge. The Patent Law gives the court the right to confiscate attached items but does not give the right to grant prohibitory injunctions (either on an interim or a final basis), which would order the defendant to stop the infringing acts. The claimant also has a right to claim damages in respect of the infringement.

United Kingdom

Remedies for infringement can include injunctions (or interdicts in Scotland), damages, an account of profits, an order for delivery up, seizure or destruction, as well as a declaration of validity and/or infringement. No statutory damages are available. The starting point for the damages calculation is generally a reasonable license fee.

It is also possible to prevent the import of infringing products.

The Patents Act provides an actionable right against those who make unjustified threats of patent infringement.

United States

The patent statute permits an award of damages in an amount adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by the infringer, together with interest and costs. Some awards may be a combination of lost profits and a reasonable royalty.

Treble damages up to three times actual damages are possible if the infringement is willful.

Failing to include appropriate patent marking can preclude recovery of damages for past infringement.

Injunctive relief is also a possible remedy.