Anti-deferral rules

Hungary
CFC
A CFC is defined as a non-resident company that meets 1 of the following conditions:
A foreign entity is regarded as a CFC if a Hungarian taxpayer, either on its own or together with related entities/persons:
- Holds a direct or indirect participation of more than 50 percent of the voting rights of that entity
- Owns, directly or indirectly, more than 50 percent of the registered capital of that entity or
- Is entitled to receive more than 50 percent of the profits of the foreign entity and
- If the participation or entitlement specified above persists during the majority of the underlying tax year.
The above definition is also applicable in relation to a Hungarian resident taxpayer and its foreign permanent establishment.
The CFC rules apply if the actual corporate tax paid by the foreign entity or permanent establishment (PE) on its profits is less than the difference between the equivalent corporate tax that would have been due in Hungary if the foreign entity or PE had been subject to Hungarian corporate income tax and the corporate income tax actually paid by the foreign entity, if all other tests are also met.
A foreign entity or PE does not qualify as CFC if the income of the foreign entity or PE is derived solely from a transaction - or series of transactions - regarded as genuine.
If the entity attains CFC status, the profit generated by that entity from a transaction, or series of transactions, that is regarded as non-genuine and reduced by the dividends declared will be included in the taxable base of the Hungarian taxpayer to the extent of amounts generated through assets and risks, which are linked to significant people functions carried out by the controlling Hungarian tax resident entity.
Dividends received from a CFC are included in the taxable base of a resident corporate taxpayer.
General anti-avoidance rules
There are several anti-avoidance rules that allow tax authorities to ignore the legal form of an arrangement between entities and examine the actual substance or genuine purpose of a contract or transaction.
The following general anti-avoidance rules are set out in the Hungarian Act on Rules of Taxation:
- A genuine economic activity clause, which is a requirement to carry out transactions of a real economic substance, and
- The prohibition of abuse of law, which is a requirement of proper exercise of the law.
Under the substance-over-clause rule, the tax consequences of transactions or the chain of transactions may be assessed according to their real substance. The general abuse-of-law doctrine examines the goal of a transaction or a chain of transactions. Should the primary goal be the avoidance of taxation or gaining tax advantages, the deductions may be denied.
General anti-avoidance rules under the Hungarian Corporate Tax Act include the following:
- Prohibition of the multiple reduction of the taxable base under the same legal title
- Transactions should make business sense; otherwise, deduction may be denied, and
- Taxpayers should act with due diligence.
Based on the general anti-avoidance rules as set out in the corporate income tax legislation costs, expenditures and losses related to a contract or a transaction are deductible for corporate income tax purposes to the extent that the underlying transaction, or series of transactions, is in line with the purpose of the applicable tax rule and is substantiated by real economic, commercial reasons. If the main purpose or one of the main purposes of the transaction, or series of transactions, is largely to achieve tax advantages contrary to the objective of the applicable tax rules, the costs and losses related to the transaction are not deductible.