This tool offers you the chance to see how jurisdictions compare for finance and investment around the world. Please select your country and legal topic area(s) of interest using the drop down menu on the left hand side of the page.

Giving and taking guarantees and security

Are there any restrictions on giving and taking guarantees and security?

UK - Scotland

UK - Scotland

Some of the key areas affecting the giving of guarantees and security are as follows.

Capacity

It is important to check the constitutional documents of a company giving a guarantee or security to ensure it has an express or ancillary power to do so and there are no restrictions on the directors' powers that would be preventative. Under Scots law, directors have a general duty to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as whole; as such, they will need to be able to show that adequate corporate benefit is derived from the company giving the guarantee or security. This is often more difficult in the case of upstream or cross-stream guarantees or security provided by a subsidiary to its parent or sister company. The safe approach is often to have the members of the company approve the giving of the guarantee or security by resolution.

Insolvency

Guarantees and security may be at risk of being set aside under Scottish insolvency laws if the guarantee or security was granted by a company with a certain period of time prior to the onset of insolvency. This would be the case if the company giving the guarantee or security received considerably less consideration, and as such, the transaction was at an undervalue. For such a transaction to be set aside, certain statutory criteria would have to be met, including that the guarantee or security was given within six months (or two years for connected parties) of the onset of insolvency of the affected party. Guarantees and security may also be challenged on other grounds relating to insolvency. Note that where a guarantee is given to a related company, the circumstances in which it can be set aside are far wider and, in particular, there is no requirement in these circumstances that the chargor was insolvent at the time the guarantee was given.

Financial assistance

It is unlawful for a public company to provide financial assistance for the purchase of its own (or of its holding company's) shares. The prohibition against financial assistance for private companies was abolished on 1 October 2008. Financial assistance in this context would include giving a guarantee or security in connection with the share purchase.

Last modified 20 Oct 2017

Are there any restrictions on lending and borrowing?

Lending

Lending is only a regulated activity in relation to mortgages and consumer lending. In these circumstances, and assuming none of the available exemptions apply, a lender will need to be authorized by the UK Financial Conduct Authority to conduct such business.

Mortgage and consumer loans are subject to a range of regulatory requirements that do not apply to unregulated loans. For example, for regulated mortgage contracts, there are particular restrictions around how:

  • the loans are marketed, originated and sold;
  • lenders administer the loans on an ongoing basis; and
  • to deal with borrowers who fall behind with their payments.

Regulated credit agreements on the other hand have specific requirements around how the agreement is drafted and formatted and what information must be included.

There are no additional restrictions that apply to foreign lenders making loans to UK borrowers.

Borrowing

While borrowers are generally not regulated, it is advisable for borrowers to consider whether either the mortgage or consumer lending regimes apply to their activities, in which case they will benefit from the protections mentioned above.

What are common lending structures?

Lending in the UK can be structured in a number of different ways to include a variety of features depending on the commercial needs of the parties.

A loan can either be provided on a bilateral basis (a single lender providing the entire facility) or syndicated basis (multiple lenders each providing parts of the overall facility).

Syndicated facilities by their nature involve more parties (such as agents and trustees which fulfil certain roles for the finance parties), are more highly structured and involve more complex documentation. Larger financings will typically be done on a syndicated basis with one of the syndicate taking the lead in coordinating and arranging the financing.

Loans will be structured to achieve specific objectives, eg term loans, working capital loans, equity bridge facilities, project facilities and letter of credit facilities etc.

Loan durations

The duration of a loan can also vary between:

  • a term loan, provided for an agreed period of time but with a short availability period;
  • a revolving loan, provided for an agreed period of time with an availability period that extends nearer to maturity of the loan and which may be redrawn if repaid;
  • an overdraft, provided on a short-term basis to solve short-term cash flow issues; or
  • a standby or a bridging loan, intended to be used in exceptional circumstances when other forms of finance are unavailable and often attracting a higher margin.

Loan security

A loan can either be secured, unsecured or guaranteed. For more information, see Giving and taking guarantees and security

Loan commitment

A loan can also be:

  • committed, meaning that the lender is obliged to provide the loan if certain conditions are fulfilled; or
  • uncommitted, meaning that the lender has discretion whether or not to provide the loan.

Loan repayment

A loan can also be repayable on demand, on an amortizing basis (in instalments over the life of the loan) or scheduled (usually meaning the loan is repayable in full at maturity).

What are the differences between lending to institutional / professional or other borrowers?

Lending to institutional/professional borrowers is subject to less regulatory oversight and so less burdensome from a compliance perspective.

By contrast, lending in the context of mortgages and to consumers is a regulated activity and so requires UK Financial Conduct Authority authorization. For more information, see Lending and borrowing – restrictions.

Do the laws recognize the principles of agency and trusts?

Yes, both principles are recognized as a matter of Scots law.

For instance, it is possible to appoint an agent to act on behalf of other parties and a trustee to hold rights and other assets on trust for the lenders or secured parties.

Are there any other notable risks or issues around lending?

Generally

Loan agreements and other finance documents are subject to general contractual principles. For example, the Scottish courts will not enforce a penalty and so lenders have to be careful about the rate of default interest charged on a loan. Lenders therefore tend to opt for a modest uplift of around 2% above the usual rate.

Specific types of lending

Specific to the area of mortgage lending is the issue of whether a lender falls within the recently formed UK mortgage regime. The Mortgage Credit Directive, implemented in the UK through a series of primary and secondary legislation, aims to prevent the irresponsible lending and borrowing practices that were exposed during the global financial crisis. The Mortgage Credit Directive applies to first and second charge mortgages. It imposes a number of requirements on lenders including the need to:

  • conduct affordability tests before lending;
  • provide standard information about the mortgage to enable borrowers to compare products; and
  • ensure that staff are suitably trained.

Standard form documentation

Although not a regulatory requirement, most Scots law syndicated finance transactions are governed by documentation based on recommended forms published by the Loan Market Association (LMA). Bilateral finance transactions are more likely to be documented on bank standard form documentation prepared in-house.

Are there any other notable risks or issues around borrowing?

Borrowers should be aware of the potential implications of the EU’s Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD), which outlines certain measures for dealing with failing financial institutions.

The BRRD applies to financial institutions incorporated in the European Economic Area (EEA), but does not apply to EEA branches of non-EEA incorporated entities.

Article 55 of the BRRD gives authorities the power to ‘bail in’ obligations of failed EEA financial institutions and also postpone the enforcement of early termination rights against the affected institution. ‘Bail in’ describes a variety of write down and conversion powers, such as the power to convert certain liabilities into shares or cancel debt instruments. In the case of English or other EEA law contracts, such powers override what the contracts says. In the case of non-EEA law contracts, there are requirements to incorporate such provisions into the contract.

Are there any restrictions on giving and taking guarantees and security?

Some of the key areas affecting the giving of guarantees and security are as follows.

Capacity

It is important to check the constitutional documents of a company giving a guarantee or security to ensure it has an express or ancillary power to do so and there are no restrictions on the directors' powers that would be preventative. Under Scots law, directors have a general duty to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as whole; as such, they will need to be able to show that adequate corporate benefit is derived from the company giving the guarantee or security. This is often more difficult in the case of upstream or cross-stream guarantees or security provided by a subsidiary to its parent or sister company. The safe approach is often to have the members of the company approve the giving of the guarantee or security by resolution.

Insolvency

Guarantees and security may be at risk of being set aside under Scottish insolvency laws if the guarantee or security was granted by a company with a certain period of time prior to the onset of insolvency. This would be the case if the company giving the guarantee or security received considerably less consideration, and as such, the transaction was at an undervalue. For such a transaction to be set aside, certain statutory criteria would have to be met, including that the guarantee or security was given within six months (or two years for connected parties) of the onset of insolvency of the affected party. Guarantees and security may also be challenged on other grounds relating to insolvency. Note that where a guarantee is given to a related company, the circumstances in which it can be set aside are far wider and, in particular, there is no requirement in these circumstances that the chargor was insolvent at the time the guarantee was given.

Financial assistance

It is unlawful for a public company to provide financial assistance for the purchase of its own (or of its holding company's) shares. The prohibition against financial assistance for private companies was abolished on 1 October 2008. Financial assistance in this context would include giving a guarantee or security in connection with the share purchase.

What are common types of guarantees and security?

Common forms of guarantees

Guarantees can take a number of forms.

A particular distinction worth remembering is between a performance guarantee and a payment guarantee:

  • A performance guarantee is a term used to describe both performance bonds (in the context of trade finance) and ‘see to it’ guarantees (in other contexts).
    • A performance bond describes a financial undertaking used to protect a buyer against the failure of a supplier to deliver goods or perform services in accordance with the terms of a contract. The issuer of the bond undertakes to pay to the buyer a sum of money if the seller fails to deliver the goods or perform the contracted services on time or in accordance with the terms of the contract.
    • A ‘see to it’ guarantee is a promise by the guarantor to see to it that the primary obligor fulfils its obligations under the primary contract. If the primary obligor fails to fulfil its obligations under the primary contract, the guarantor will be in breach of its obligations under the guarantee.
  • A payment guarantee is narrower in scope than a performance guarantee as it only covers the payment of money rather than other contractual obligations.

Common forms of security

The law of Scotland differs greatly from that in England and Wales in relation to the forms of security which can be taken over assets located in Scotland. Scots law does not recognize a distinction between equitable and legal charges. In general, Scottish security can be taken over a much more limited range of assets than is the case in England and Wales and there is no overarching security document which would replicate an English debenture. The main forms of security available in Scotland are as follows.

Standard security

This is the equivalent of an English legal mortgage and relates to security over heritable or feuhold property (the equivalent of freehold under English law) and leasehold property for a term of more than 20 years. Standard securities follow a statutory form.

Floating charges

A floating charge is a charge over all of the assets of a company and, unlike the position in England, the floating charge is a separate legal document in Scotland covering all of the assets of a company that are held at the time of enforcement, subject to the priority of certain fixed charges and of certain other preferred debts (included a ‘prescribed part’ which is made available for unsecured creditors). A floating charge is usually enforced by way of appointment of an administrator.

Assignations in security

This is a form of security which can be created over incorporeal moveable assets in Scotland and is the equivalent of an English law assignment. However, because there is no concept of equitable security in Scotland, any assignation in security must be intimated (effectively notified to the counter party) in order for the security to be treated as valid.

Pledges

A pledge is a fixed security over corporeal moveable property. In order to perfect a pledge, the chargee, or its nominee, must have possession of the actual asset. For that reason the only form of pledge which is common to see in Scotland is a pledge over shares. In order to perfect a pledge over shares, the shares in the relevant company must be transferred to the chargee, or its nominee. This is often an issue for banks out with Scotland even though the Companies Act does largely address the various concerns that are raised in relation to this, for example, by making it clear that where shares are only held by way of security, the registered shareholder does not need to treat the relevant company as part of its overall group for various purposes including tax. It should be noted that, in addition to this, the introduction of the person with significant control regime in the UK has led to an (ongoing) debate amongst lawyers in Scotland as to whether a bank which holds shares in a company by way of security should be treated as a person of significant control in relation to that company. The view that the firm takes at present is that this is not the case. However, other firms in the market disagree.

Are there any other notable risks or issues around giving and taking guarantees and security?

Giving or taking guarantees

To be probative (ie admissible in court without further evidence), a guarantee needs to be in writing and signed by the guarantor.

Guarantees and other securities can be signed on a unilateral basis (ie unlike the case of English law, there is no requirement under Scots law that a guarantee should be given for consideration (although see above for other conditions).

Additionally, there is a risk that a guarantee may be set aside if it was procured by undue influence by a borrower or lender. A party being provided with a guarantee should be alive to this issue and take steps to avoid claims of undue influence by, for example, requiring the guarantor to take separate legal advice (note, this is a significant issue if the guarantor is an individual, particularly if they are a spouse of the borrower).

Giving or taking security

Some funders take the view that rather than intimate the assignation and security of a contract or write themselves up as registered members pursuant to a share pledge, they will maintain an 'unintimated' or 'unregistered' position up until such a time as they require to enforce the relevant security. This is occasionally seen in the Scottish market although DLA Piper advise against taking this approach as, if the 'intimation' occurs only at the time of enforcement, then there is a greater risk that this may be set aside as someone taking security following the onset of insolvency.

Once granted, security needs to be properly perfected before it is valid against third parties. Perfection formalities can range from having the secured asset delivered to the security holder, registration of the security and notice being given to third parties. Most charges created by a Scottish company must be registered at Companies House within 21 days of its creation. Failure to register within this time means that the charge will be void against the liquidator, administrator or any creditor of the company and the money secured by the charge becomes immediately payable.

There are no notarization requirements for security documents under Scots law.

Like guarantees, for a period after a new security interest has been granted (known as the hardening period), it is at risk of being set aside in certain circumstances under insolvency laws. Reviewable transactions include those conducted at an undervalue, preferences and invalid floating charges.

Sarah Day

Sarah Day

Partner
DLA Piper UK LLP
[email protected]
T +44 (0)113 369 2104
View bio

Add to home screen

To add this site to your home screen open the browser option menu and tap on Add to home screen.

To add this site to your home screen tap arrow and then plus